|We make better drivers and riders|
|Home||Membership||Observed Drives||F.A.Q.||Newsletters||News||Members’ Area|
|Events||Meetings||What’s New||Quizzes||Contact Us||Links||Observers’ Area|
This article was published in the January, 2005 Newsletter. The signage has since been simplified and the speed limit is now 30mph.
Has the Royal Borough’s Highways Department gone completely barmy? Approaching Cannon Down Bridge, Cookham, drivers have no fewer than 30 pieces of information to absorb in the space of 200 yards, apart from any other road users (quotes indicate printed text):
Despite all this, or perhaps because of it the majority of drivers having to give way overshoot the line. What is the point of this information overload? How much has it cost Council Tax payers? What does all this clutter achieve? How long do priorities have to exist before they cease to be "changed"?
Clearly this is a dangerous location. The obvious solution would be to create a separate tunnel for pedestrians and remove the pavement under the bridge. No doubt this is considered too expensive or perhaps it just requires too much imagination. So what do they do? It seems every time someone has a narrow squeak they add an extra sign. It obviously hasn't yet occurred to anyone to add a road junction sign!
Road safety would be greatly improved by removing all but essential standard signs and correctly positioning the remainder. Perhaps our council should take a lead from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea which is planning to remove all the clutter from Exhibition Road.
It would be sensible to reduce the speed limit to 30mph on the approach side of the bridge only, so that at the point you are committed to your passage you can accelerate to clear the bridge swiftly. Unfortunately it is beyond the wit of British civil servants to have different speed limits in opposite directions.
Photo: R. Porter
Last updated: 11th July, 2020